Claude + Perceptis: compare, edit and export an eight-slide deck

Keep the comparison inputs consistent

Thanks to Perceptis for sponsoring this video.

Luke supplies the same two eight-slide business briefs to Claude alone and Claude with Perceptis. Company figures are demo data, and this recording does not audit source fidelity or time both routes.

1. Prepare the same source brief, audience, slide count and required figures for each route.
2. Generate the Claude-only version and keep the original output.
3. Connect Perceptis through the Claude MCP setup shown at 2:23.
4. Run the same brief through the connected workflow without silently improving one route’s instructions.

Judge the slides and editing workflow separately

Luke prefers Perceptis for clearer boardroom-style visuals and practical editing, while finding the Claude-only output better than expected. That is a judgement about these outputs.

1. Compare information hierarchy, readability and the suitability of each slide for the audience.
2. Change one slide’s layout without regenerating the full deck.
3. Try an alternative layout or an appropriate slide-library asset.
4. If using a knowledge base, check that the supplied company documents actually support the slide’s claims.

Export and inspect the editable file

The walkthrough exports PowerPoint and opens it in Canva. A successful download alone does not prove that the elements remain usable.

1. Export the intended deck and open the file in Canva.
2. Select text and graphics and verify the edits you need are possible.
3. Check fonts, cropping, charts and slide order after import.
4. Review figures and source claims separately before treating the deck as ready for a business decision.

The takeaway

The demonstration supports a comparison of the visible outputs and editing workflow. It does not establish a speed benchmark or audited factual accuracy.